The ADAM17 inhibitor ZLDI-8 sensitized hepatocellular carcinoma cells to sorafenib through Notch1-integrin ß-talk.

ZLDI-8 is an A disintegrin and metalloproteinase domain 17 (ADAM17) inhibitor that suppresses the shedding of Notch1 to the Notch1 intracellular domain (NICD). In previous studies, we found that ZLDI-8 was able to sensitize HCC to sorafenib, but the mechanism of action remains unclear. The sensitizing effects of ZLDI-8 were tested both in vitro and in vivo. EMT-related factors, sorafenib sensitivity-related proteins and ECM-related gene expression were assessed using immunohistochemistry, RTPCR and Western blotting. Knockdown assays were conducted to determine the relationship between the Notch and Integrin pathways. CoIP assays, nuclear and cytoplasmic fractionation and immunofluorescence colocalization were applied to explore the interaction between the Notch and Integrin pathways. Appropriate statistical analysis methods were used to assess the significance of the experimental results and to ensure the scientific validity and reliability of the experimental design. We found that ECM- and EMT-related proteins were downregulated after ZLDI-8 treatment (P<0.05). ZLDI-8 significantly downregulated Integrinß1 and Integrinß3 in HCC in vitro and in vivo (P<0.05), possibly through Foxc2-dependent regulation. Mechanistically, interfering with the expression of both Integrin-linked kinase (ILK) and the NICD may downregulate the expression of proteins targeted by sorafenib, thereby sensitizing cells to sorafenib. The retroregulation of Integrinß by ILK may occur through the interaction between the NICD and ILK and may be the result of the translocation of the complexus. Our study indicates that blocking the Notch pathway may affect Integrinß through crosstalk between the Notch1 and Integrinß/ILK signaling pathways, thus providing a potential therapeutic strategy for HCC.

Incidence of renal cell carcinoma after solid organ transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The incidence rate of malignant tumors after solid organ transplantation is higher than the normal population. The aim of our study is to identify the risk of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) after liver, kidney, heart and lung transplantation, respectively, and suggest that transplant patients can be screened early for tumors to avoid risk. METHODS: PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library from their inception until August 16,2023. Retrospective and cohort studies which focus on the statistical data of standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) of RCC after solid organ transplantation (SOT) more than one year have been included and extracted. The study was registered with PROSPERO, CRD4202022343633. RESULTS: Sixteen original studies have been included for meta-analysis. Liver transplantation could increase the risk of RCC (SIR = 0.73, 95%CI: 0.53 to 0.93) with no heterogeneity(P = 0.594, I2 = 0.0%). And kidney transplantation could increase the risk of RCC(8.54, 6.68 to 10.40; 0.000,90.0%). Besides, heart and lung transplantation also could increase the risk of RCC(SIR = 0.73, 95%CI: 0.53 to 0.93; SIR = 1.61, 95%CI:0.50 to 2.71). Moreover, significance could also be found in most subgroups, especially the European group and retrospective study group. What's more, after removing studies which have a greater impact on the overall outcome in RCC rate after kidney transplantation, heterogeneity did not solve and significant different was also observed in the European group (7.15, 5.49 to 8.81; 0.000, 78.6%). CONCLUSION: Liver, kidney, heart and lung transplantation patients have an increased risk of processing RCC compared to the general population and most subgroups, especially in geographic location of European subgroup, which suggested that patients should be screened frequently after transplantation.

What Is the Most Suitable Agent Combined With Apatinib for Transarterial Chemoembolization Treatment in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients? A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.

Purpose: Combined therapy with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and apatinib is superior in therapeutic effect compared with TACE alone in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). To determine the most suitable agent combined with apatinib for TACE treatment, we did a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Methods: Four electronic databases were searched from inception until November 2021. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and retrospective studies that combined therapy of TACE and apatinib (TACE+A) compared with TACE alone were included. We performed random-effect pairwise and network meta-analyses to summarize the outcomes about efficacy and safety. Results: Forty-five original studies including 3,876 patients were included. In terms of efficacy, we evaluated treatment response, 6 months overall survival (OS), 1 year OS, 6 months progression-free survival (PFS), 1 year PFS, alphafetoprotein (AFP), matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP9), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Significant differences always appear in TACE agent subgroups of adriamycin, platinum, and fluorouracil from both pairwise and network meta-analysis, while significant differences could also be found in apatinib dosage of 500 and >500 mg/day subgroups and in both RCT and retrospective study subgroups. From second time network analysis, compared with TACE alone, subgroups with TACE agents of oxaliplatin, cisplatin, pirarubicin, epirubicin, and 5-fluorouracil ranked front. In addition, the safety of adriamycin, platinum, and fluorouracil subgroups is acceptable. Conclusions: In conclusion, the most suitable agents in TACE combined with apatinib were adriamycin+platinum ± fluorouracil combination therapy. Systematic Review Registration: The study was registered with https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=311650, PROSPERO, CRD4202022311650.